<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimum Keyword Density is a Gimmick!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conceptcurry.com/search-engine-marketing/optimal-keyword-density-gimmick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conceptcurry.com/search-engine-marketing/optimal-keyword-density-gimmick/</link>
	<description>Startups, Web 2.0, Search Marketing, Social Media, Web Analytics, Online Travel, Mobile, Technology &#38; the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek Bhardwaj</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptcurry.com/search-engine-marketing/optimal-keyword-density-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conceptcurry.com/?p=163#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Re:Philippe

I am glad you think so. And yes Latent Semantics are far more advanced than mere Keyword Density.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:Philippe</p>
<p>I am glad you think so. And yes Latent Semantics are far more advanced than mere Keyword Density.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek Bhardwaj</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptcurry.com/search-engine-marketing/optimal-keyword-density-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conceptcurry.com/?p=163#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Karl,

I agree with your statement completely

&quot;Taking the non-tweaker approach to SEO seems to deliver much greater longevity of high rankings as well.&quot;

That is what SEO is, quality content for your visitors and then for the search engines too.

Thanks for supporting the view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl,</p>
<p>I agree with your statement completely</p>
<p>&#8220;Taking the non-tweaker approach to SEO seems to deliver much greater longevity of high rankings as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is what SEO is, quality content for your visitors and then for the search engines too.</p>
<p>Thanks for supporting the view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Kleinbach</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptcurry.com/search-engine-marketing/optimal-keyword-density-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Kleinbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conceptcurry.com/?p=163#comment-57</guid>
		<description>While I can&#039;t say there is no improvement in rankings to be gained from manipulating keyword density, I will wholeheartedly endorse your view that the focus should be on providing excellent content and not changing copy to &quot;improve&quot; keyword density.

Taking the non-tweaker approach to SEO seems to deliver much greater longevity of high rankings as well. 

In our case we&#039;ve kept our rankings for over 4 years with a focus on core SEO techniques and great content. 

The bonus? Because the content isn&#039;t a bunch of repetitive nonsense our conversion rate has improved right along with our traffic volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I can&#8217;t say there is no improvement in rankings to be gained from manipulating keyword density, I will wholeheartedly endorse your view that the focus should be on providing excellent content and not changing copy to &#8220;improve&#8221; keyword density.</p>
<p>Taking the non-tweaker approach to SEO seems to deliver much greater longevity of high rankings as well. </p>
<p>In our case we&#8217;ve kept our rankings for over 4 years with a focus on core SEO techniques and great content. </p>
<p>The bonus? Because the content isn&#8217;t a bunch of repetitive nonsense our conversion rate has improved right along with our traffic volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptcurry.com/search-engine-marketing/optimal-keyword-density-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conceptcurry.com/?p=163#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you Abhishek. People are still considering Keywords density, but this is a wrong SEO mindset. It does not make sense anymore, since Search engines are using Latent Semantic Indexing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you Abhishek. People are still considering Keywords density, but this is a wrong SEO mindset. It does not make sense anymore, since Search engines are using Latent Semantic Indexing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
